PART I.
POPULATION DENSITY AND DISTRIBUTION
Materials
6 light traps placed overnight in
Foster Lake at three different depths
placed a t a central table:
6 large finger bowls
for holding the contents of the light traps - labeled for depth
glass stir rods
poster guide to
microcrustaceans
for each student group:
100 ml beaker
10ml transfer beaker
glass stir rod
hand-held mechanical
counter
disposable pipets
dissecting microscope
Procedure
Small aquatic organisms are often attracted to light. A
lighted funnel trap suspended in the water at night is a
convenient way to collect a concentrated sample of these
organisms. Foster Lake contains at least three taxa of
microcrustaceans: branchiopods (especially Daphnia),
copepods (especially Cyclops), and ostracods.
Usually Daphnia are the most numerous and easiest to
identify and count.
Your instructor has suspended "light traps" in Foster Lake at
three different depths. The traps were hung last night and
retrieved this morning. Your instructor will explain the design
and function of the traps. The lake water collected in these
traps has been transferred to large finger bowls, labeled with
the depth at which the trap was suspended, and placed on a
central table. Enter these three depths across the top row
of the table below.
1.
Set up your dissecting microscope, turn on the light(s)
and center the small watch glass on the stage. Obtain a 50-100
ml sample of lake water from each of the three finger
bowls by the following method:
a. Stir the water in the finger bowl to randomly disperse the
organisms in the water.
b. Fill the 100 ml beaker somewhat more than half full
by dipping it into the finger bowl. Do this quickly before the
suspended organisms have time to settle or redistribute
themselves.
c. Carry the 100ml beaker to your table.
d. Label the 100ml beaker with a piece of tape, marked to
indicate the appropriate sampling depth.
You should now have three lake water samples at your desk, each
containing in a 100 ml beaker, and each correctly labeled to
indicate the lake depth from which that sample was obtained.
2.
For each of your 50-80 ml samples repeat the
following steps four times:
a. Stir or swirl the sample in the 100 ml beaker.
b. Immediately pour 10 ml of this sample into the 10 ml
beaker (fill the 10 ml beaker to the top).
c. Empty the 10 ml beaker into the small watch glass on the
microscope stage.
d. Look through the oculars, focus the microscope, and then move
the watch glass to center the 1 cm circle in the field of view.
e. Using the hand-held counter, quickly count the number of
Daphnia within this circle. Do NOT count Daphnia
outside the circle. Also, be sure to count ONLY Daphnia,
and not other organisms. Enter this number in the table
below.
f. Empty and wipe out the watch glass, then put in back on the
microscope stage.
3.
The volume of pond water within which you counted Daphnia
for each sample was 0.4 milliliters. To produce a useable
number for the population density of Daphnia, add up your
four population counts, then multiply this number by 625. This
will give you an estimate of the density of Daphnia in the light
trap at that depth, expressed as # of Daphnia per liter). Enter
these values in the last row of the table below.
Sample #
|
Lake Depth (cm) |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
Sum |
|
|
|
Total/L (Sum x 625) |
|
|
|
4. Discard the remainder of your lake water samples.
5.
For the Worksheet produce a bar graph of population density (in
# Daphnia/liter) as a function of lake depth (in meters). On
this graph lake depth (the independent variable) should
be on the Y axis and population density (the dependent
variable) should be on the X axis. Note: this is
opposite the convention of putting the independent variable on
the X axis, but is the accepted practice where the independent
variable is inherently vertical (e.g.depth).
PART
II. COMMUNITY DIVERSITY
Materials
18 Hester-Dendy samplers placed in
Wolf Creek at the back of the Arboretum.
class data sheet
for each student group:
pencil or pen
clipboard
sampler data sheets
sampler retrieval
containers
bucket
meter stick
stopwatch
small float on a
string
lighted magnifier
dissecting microscope
multiple small
containers for isolating stream invertebrates
forceps
disposable plastic
pipets
pocket calculator
Stream Invertebrate Key
Procedure
The invertebrate population of streams may include fresh-water
molluscs such as clams and snails, annelids such as aquatic
earthworms and leeches, crustaceans such as crayfish and
isopods, arachnids such as mites, and variety of insect larvae
and pupae. These invertebrates constitute a major part of the
biological community of the stream. A reasonable theoretical
hypothesis is that the particular distribution of types and
relative numbers of these invertebrates will differ between
different areas of the stream, based on such factors as water
velocity, water depth, and oxygenation.
To
assess the biodiversity of an ecosystem, one needs to first
collect a sample of the organisms. One simple way of
sampling takes advantage of the fact that many aquatic
organisms will rapidly colonize any new surface or substrate
introduced into the water. A standard sampling
device for those invertebrates which cling to surfaces is the
Hester-Dendy sampler. This is a set of parallel or circular
wooden plates, strung at fixed intervals on a long central
spindle, which is held in place in the stream by an anchor.
Over the course of days to weeks a collection of invertebrates
will attach themselves, or simply cling to the smooth surfaces
of the sampler. When the sampler is carefully retrieved, these
invertebrate residents and visitors may be sorted and
identified.
Our samplers each consist of 9 3-inch square hardboard plates,
spaced along a 5 ½ inch bolt at approximately ¼ or ½ inch
intervals. They were placed two weeks ago in Wolf Creek. Half
of the samplers were positioned in relatively deep and
slow-moving “calm” sections of the creek and the other half of
the samplers were positioned in shallow and fast-moving “riffle”
areas. You will start this lab today by retrieving each sampler
into a container with water from the creek and carrying these
samplers to our lab area for invertebrate identification and
counting. Our operationalized experimental hypothesis for this
part of the lab is that the particular distribution of types and
relative numbers of invertebrates collected on our samplers will
differ between the calm and riffle conditions, reflecting the
underlying community differences.
Independent variable:
categorical – “calm” and “riffle” conditions
descriptive - location of sampler
numerical - stream surface flow rate
Dependent variables:
numerical – richness - the number of different taxa
heterogeneity - calculated value of Simpson’s Index
descriptive – the specific makeup of the sampled
community
Sampler Retrieval
Your class will be retrieving 18 samplers for analysis, 9 each
from the calm and riffle areas. You will work in pairs to
retrieve the samplers.
1) Take a small plastic transfer container, a
float-on-a-string, a meter stick, and a bucket and wade
into the creek. Locate an appropriate sampler. Each
sampler may be found by the small float attached to it.
2) Use the float-on-a-string, meter stick, and
stopwatch to measure the depth and the local surface flow rate
of the stream. The instructor will demonstrate how to
obtain these measures. Characterize the sampler site as
either "calm" or "riffle", then enter this along with the
measured flow rate on a new sampler data sheet.
3) Fill the transfer container with stream water. Try to
avoid including any debris floating in the water. Rapidly but
carefully lift the sampler out of the stream and transfer it to
the filled container. Unclip the rock/brick anchor and float
and transfer these to an empty bucket. Note the number
written on the sampler plates and enter this on your data sheet.
4) Place one or two samplers from in each
transfer container, making sure that both samplers come from
the same region of the creek (either calm or riffle) and
that both samples are odd numbered or both are even-numbered.
Remember to wade back out of the creek when you are done. Seal
each transfer container by clipping the lid in place.
5) Carry all of the samples in their sealed containers to
the lab for analysis. Also bring along your bucket of
bricks, youe data sheets, and your other measurement implements.
Identifying and Tabulating Stream Invertebrates:
1) Carefully transfer each sampler and some of its
surrounding water to a clean observation container. Find the
data sheet corresponding to the sampler ID number (1-38) .
Carefully disassemble the sampler by removing the wingnut then
sliding the plates and spacer bolts off of the central bolt and
into the water in the tray. Invertebrates may be clinging to
the plates or to the spacer bolts, so keep all of the
hardware in the water.
2) Carefully examine each plate from the sampler. Use a
magnifier and/or dissecting microscope as necessary to locate
and examine each organism. Use the Stream Invertebrate Key to
identify each organism to the taxonomic level of Order (insects)
or Class (all other invertebrates). If you are at all uncertain
about your classification, consult the instructor or course
assistant. As the lab progresses you will become familiar
enough with these organisms to classify them on sight.
Record each new taxon on your data sheet and keep a running tally
of the exact number of organisms of that taxon.
3) If you wish, you may transfer individual tallied
organisms to one of the fingerbowls for additional observation.
Once you are sure that you have counted each organism on an
individual plate, transfer it and all of its organisms to the
“waste” bucket.
4) Continue until you have examined and discarded
all 9 plates from that sampler. Then examine the remaining
hardware (spacers and bolt) and tally any additional organisms,
discarding this hardware into the waste bucket when you are
finished. Now carefully examine the water sample that the
sampler was in and tally any organisms that you find there.
Dump this water into the wastewater bucket when you are
finished, then proceed to the next sampler.
Compiling the Class Data and Calculating Community Measures:
1) When you are finished with all of the samplers assigned to
your two-person team, add your tallies to the master data sheet
for the class. Be sure that you add the numbers to the correct
invertebrate taxon and to the correct stream condition – calm or
riffle.
2) Count the number of different taxa (not individuals!)
under each condition - calm and riffle. This number is the
richness of the community. Enter these values in
the table below. Which stream condition showed the
higher richness?
3) Calculate Simpson's Index for each condition, using the
procedure detailed below. This number is a measure of the
heterogeneity of the community. Enter these
values in the table below. Which stream condition
showed the higher heterogeneity? What additional
information does a measure of heterogeneity provide beyond that
of a simple measure of richness?
4) Finally, examine the specific community composition for
each stream condition. Which organisms were most common
under each condition? Where any organisms found only under
one of the two conditions?
Stream
Condition |
Diversity Measures |
Richness |
Heterogeneity |
Calm |
|
|
Riffle |
|
|
Simpson's Index
An mathematical “index” is a number which varies between 0
(minimal value) and 1 (maximal value). Simpsons Index is
a quantitative measure of the diversity of a collection of
discrete types of objects or organisms. Simpson’s Index always
has a value between 0 (no diversity) and 1 (infinite diversity).
The formula for Simpson’s Index (SI) that we will use is:
SI = 1 – (sum(ni2)/N2
)
where ni is the number of organisms of
each taxon i
and N is the total number of organisms of all
taxa ( = sum(ni
))
When all of the organisms are of the same single taxon, then
sum(ni2)
= N2, the ratio
sum(ni2)/N2
= 1, and SI = 0 , meaning zero
diversity.
As the number of distinct taxa becomes large and the organisms
become evenly distributed across all of the taxa, then
sum(ni2)
becomes very small as compared to N2, the
ratio sum(ni2)/N2
approaches 0, and SI approaches 1,
meaning infinite diversity.
As an example, imagine that the data set for Sample I is:
Taxon A – 8 organisms
Taxon B – 6 organisms
Taxon C – 4 organisms
Taxon D – 2 organisms
TOTAL – 20 organisms
SI = 1 – { [ (82) + (62) + (42)
+ (22)] / (202) }
= 1 – { [64+36+16+4] / 400 }
= 1 – {120/400 }
= 1 - 0.3
= 0.7
Now, imagine that the data set for Sample II is:
Taxon A – 25 organisms
Taxon B – 2 organisms
Taxon C – 1 organism
Taxon D – 1 organisms
Taxon E – 1 organisms
TOTAL – 30 organisms
SI = 1 – { [ (252) + (22) + (12)
+ (12) + (12) ] / (302) }
= 1 – { [625+4+1+1+1] / 900 }
= 1 – { 632 / 900 }
= 1- 0.7
= 0.3
Even though Sample II has more total organisms and more taxa (a
higher "richness"), the organisms are predominantly of the
single taxon A. By comparison, Sample I has organisms more
evenly distributed more evenly across several taxa. So Sample I
has the higher heterogeneity, as reflected in its higher
Simpson’s Index value.
|