IV.
A REALLY ANNOYING THOUGHT PROBLEM
Consider
the following situation (actually fairly common in
invertebrates), where Cell A is presynaptic to Cell B via an
excitatory chemical synapse. Cells B and C are directly coupled
via an electrical synapse.
Use what you have
learned in the past two simulation labs about both electrical
and chemical synapses to answer the
following questions. This would be a really good set to
discuss with your classmates prior to the next exam.
Q1:
Explain how a quietly-resting Cell C might exert a "shunting"
inhibitory effect on PSPs in Cell B via
this electrical synapse.
Q2:
How would the extent of this inhibitory effect depend on the
relative sizes of cells B and C?
Q3:
How would the extent of this inhibitory effect depend on
the size (conductance) of the electrical synapse?
You should
recognize that these considerations also work for situations
where B and C are not distinct cells, but rather are simply two
different compartments in the same cell, separated by a
relatively high-resistance pathway. A common example in
vertebrate neurons is that of the dendritic “spine” or “gemmule”.
These are small, roughly spherical protuberances on dendrites.
Each spine is separated from the dendritic shaft by a
constricted “neck” region, which can have a relatively high
internal resistance. This produces a partial electrical
isolation of the dendritic spine. We will be discussing this in
class.
Q4:
What if Cell/Compartment B had active membrane (could fire
action potentials)? This is actually the case in many dendritic
spines. How might the internal resistance between B and C
influence the ability of B to reach threshold and fire an action
potential? How might this, in turn, affect B’s influence on C?
You
should also realize what a great potential test question this
situation provides. H’mmm.
V.
PREPARATION OF THE LAB DATA SHEET
|